Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 3(6): 1522-1526 November 2017
Assessment for
Variation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Selected Plants in Bengaluru Urban
Manjunath B.T1, Jayarama Reddy2*
1Research
Scholar, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University,
Coimbatore, India
2Professor,
Department of Botany, St. Joseph’s College, 36, Langford Road, Bengaluru, India
*Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Jayarama Reddy, Professor, Department of Botany, St. Joseph’s College, 36, Langford Road, Bengaluru, India
Received: 05
August 2017/Revised: 23 August 2017/Accepted: 19 October 2017
ABSTRACT-
To develop the usefulness of Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Catharanthus roseus plants as bioindicators,
which entail an utmost importance for a particular situation.
This study focuses on the assessment of air pollution tolerance index (APTI) of
two selected plant species commonly found along roadsides in Bengaluru, India. The plant species selected for the study
were Caesalpinia pulcherrima
and Catharanthus roseus. The
plants were evaluated in terms of APTI by analyzing four different biochemical
parameters: Leaf relative water content (RWC), Ascorbic
acid content (AA), Total leaf chlorophyll (TCh), and
pH of leaf extract. Based on APTI Caesalpinia pulcherrima was found to be more tolerant compared to Catharanthus roseus. Species with
lower APTI value are considered sensitive species, which can be used as a
biological indicator for further monitoring of air quality. Species with higher
APTI value are tolerant species and thus, can be planted for pollution
abatement in order to control and reduce environmental pollution.
Key-words- Air
pollution tolerance index (APTI), biochemical parameters, roadside plants, Biomonitors
INTRODUCTION- Air
Pollution can be simply defined as an undesirable change in the physical,
chemical and biological properties of air due to anthropogenic or any other
cause. An air pollutant is a substance in the air that can have adverse effects
on humans and the ecosystem. The substance can be solid particles, liquid
droplets, or gases. Air pollution is a serious problem throughout the world.
Rapid industrialization and vehicular traffic especially in the urban areas of
India lead to the deterioration of air quality by adding toxic gases and other
substances to the atmosphere. All combustion releases gases and particulate
matter into the air, which includes SO2,
NO2, CO and soot particles as well as
smaller quantities of toxic metals, organic molecules, and radioactive isotopes etc. The degradation of air quality is the major environmental problem that affects
many urban and industrial sites and the
surrounding regions worldwide. Although various efforts have been done for
environmental restoration in India still it seems to be a formidable task. A
pollutant can be of natural origin or manmade. Air Pollution results in huge
harm to the living organisms.
There are several morphological, behavioral, physiological and anatomical changes in plants and animals due to air pollution. But the effect is different in different organisms depending on the chemical the substance causing the pollution [1-3]. The responses of plants to the severity of their environment have attracted the attention of a man long before the establishment of the science of Biology. To a lay man, plants that survive in a harsh environment are ‘hardy’; those which do not are ‘tender’. Biologists have adopted the term stress for any environmental factor potentially unfavorable to living organisms and stress resistance for the ability of the plant to survive the unfavorable factor and even to grow in its presence. A biological stress can be defined as any environmental factor capable of inducing a potentially, injurious strain in living organisms. The living organisms may show a physical strain or change or a chemical strain [4].
Air pollutions
can directly affect plants via leaves or indirectly via soil acidification. It
has also been reported that when exposed to air pollutants, most plant
experience physiological changes before exhibiting visible damage to leaves.
Studies have also shown the impacts of
air pollution of Ascorbic acid content chlorophyll content, leaf extract pH, and relative water
content. These separate
parameters gave conflicting results
for same species. However, the air pollution tolerance index (APTI) based on all four parameters has been used
for identifying tolerance levels of plant
species. Several contributors agree that air pollutants affect plant growth adversely. These urban air pollutants not
only represent a threat to human
health and the urban
environment but it can also contribute to serious regional and global atmospheric pollution problem. Among the air
pollutants, air-borne particulates specifically trace elements and heavy metals constitute the major pollutant
burden in the urban environment, which
needs to be monitored,
filtered and regulated. With
regard to the mitigation of these
severe problems, policy
should be adopted to control the pollution burden by means of monitoring, filtering and regulating the pollutants and
their proper management. One of the
important technique is the urban plantation and green
belt development with suitable plant
species in an appropriate manner, which is highly imperative
to biofilter the toxic pollutants as well as other economic value. It is an established
fact that vegetation plays an important role by
cleaning the
atmosphere by absorbing
certain toxic air pollutants from its surroundings and also abatement of noise
pollution.
Thus Green belts are
recommended for containment of air pollution in the human environment,
especially in the
urban and industrial environment. Model for green belt, development is recently developed in
relation to pollution around industrial premises. In addition, there were the numbers of other benefits like an
aesthetic improvement, climatic amelioration, biomass
generation, enhancement of biodiversity etc. are the bonus derived through the presence of greenery in
the areas. In an urban region of Iran, it has become mandatory for large-scale polluting industry
to plant appropriate green belts in and around its unit to protect surrounding ecology. Plants
remove air pollutants primarily by uptake via leaf stomata and once inside the leaf, gases
diffuse into intercellular spaces and absorbed by water films. Plants, grown in such a way as to
function as pollutants sinks are collectively referred to as greenbelts which have limits to their
tolerance towards air pollutants. Greening by plantation,
which makes use of
vegetation to remove, detoxify or stabilize persistently
pollutants is a green and
environment friendly tool
for a clean environment. The screening of
effective plants for the particulate sink is essential
for air pollution abatement in an urban
environment. The routine
analysis of elements thus needs from the foliage of urban trees are essential
to understanding the level of metal
bioaccumulation and its consequent effect on
the plant. Increased
urbanization, industrialization, and heavy vehicular traffic have resulted in deterioration of air quality. However, no
major attempt has been taken to assess about bioaccumulation of urban plant
specifically to assess the tolerance of atmospheric pollutants in an appropriate manner [5,22-25]. Hence, the present study is concerned with
the establishment of air pollution biomonitoring
capacity with special reference to biochemical and study in a critically
polluted region of Bangalore. Air Pollution Tolerance Index is a measure of
tolerance level in the plants for air pollution.
Researchers related to Air Pollution
Tolerance Index have been done in many places. Air pollution is one of the leading topics of
discussion these days due to the pollutants created or generated by our modern life. So, the current topic is been researched in many
places in
India, as well as other
countries. The methods of screening of plants for their tolerance level to air pollutants is important because the sensitive
plants can serve as bio- indicator and the tolerant plants as a sink
for controlling air
pollution in urban and industrial areas. So, in order to evaluate the
susceptibility level of
plants to air pollutants,
four parameters namely leaf
extract pH, Relative Water
Content, Ascorbic acid and chlorophyll content were determined and computed
together
in a formulation signifying
the Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of grown plant species in polluted and non-polluted areas of
Bangalore. The plant species can be identified as tolerant or sensitive ones using Air Pollution Tolerance Index
(APTI) scale
method, which is based upon
the variation of selected biochemical parameters. It is a very useful index and
can classify plant species in various scales like
very sensitive, sensitive,
intermediate, and tolerant.
The tolerant ones can serve as sinks for the abatement of air pollution in urban and industrial habitats
and sensitive ones can be used as bio-indicators. APTI value was calculated based on the biochemical
parameters as described in methodology and variation of APTI among the plant species with respect to polluted
site and control sites
are been presented. The APTI
values obtained for different plants were compared to find out the sensitivity/tolerance of these plants. It was
reported that plants with relatively low index value are generally sensitive to air pollutants and vice versa.
The APTI determination
provides a reliable method
for screening a large number of plants
with respect to their susceptibility
to air pollutants. The
method is simple and convenient to adopt
field conditions without adopting any costly environmental monitoring gadgets.
The sensitive species can be used as bio-indicators and tolerant species can be
used as a sink for air pollutants. Plants have been categorized into groups according to their
degree of sensitivity
toward and tolerance of
various air pollutants on the basis of experiment and available data. Levels of
tolerance to air pollution vary from species to species, depending on the
capacity of plants to withstand the effect of pollutants without showing any
external damage [6].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling
site- The non-polluted zone, Christ University grounds is
situated on the Hosur main road, inverse to dairy
circle, Bangalore, India. The place is located at the height of 900 m above the
sea
level.
The coordinates on the globe correspond to 12o 56’North and 77 o 36’ in the
East. The range is loaded with greenery thus zone is less inclined to Air
Pollution. Consequently, this site is had been considered as a Control site for
the study. The polluted zone for the under study was the Hosur
highway, which is situated in Bengaluru, Karnataka.
This place is also located at the height of 900 m above the sea level. The
coordinates on the globe correspond to 12o 56’North and 77o 36’ in the East.
The area was highly polluted due to the industries and a huge amount of
vehicles due to daily traffic.
Sampling Procedure- Plants were selected from one of the major Highway in Hosur, which has high levels of vehicular emissions and
industrial emissions. The criterion for the selection of these
plants was mainly on their availability and
abundance of these two species Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Catharanthus roseus in parts of Bengaluru
urban area. Six replicates of fully matured plants from both control and
polluted zone were taken and immediately taken to the laboratory in a heatproof
container for the analysis.
Air Pollution Tolerance Index Technique (APTI)- To calculate APTI the following four parameters for the samples were analyzed:
Total Chlorophyll Content (TCh)- Total
chlorophyll content of the leaf samples were done using the spectrophotometric
method described by Arnon [7]. Leaf
samples were macerated with 30 mL of distilled water and
left aside for 15 min for through extraction. The leaf extract was decanted
into centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min. Absorbance was
read at 645 nm, 663 nm, and 75 nm using UV-Visible Spectrophotometer.
The calculation of total chlorophyll content was done using formula:
TCh = [20.2(A645) + 8.02(A663)] × [V/
(1000 x W)]
Where, TCh=
Total chlorophyll in mg/g
A645= Absorbance at 645 nm minus
the absorbance at 750 nm
A663= Absorbance at 663 nm minus
the absorbance at 750 nm
V= Total volume of the extract in mL
W= Weight of the sample in g
Ascorbic
Acid (AA) Content Analysis- Ascorbic acid content (expressed in mg/g) was measured using
spectrophotometric method [8,14,21].
One gram of the fresh foliage was put in a test-tube, 4 ml oxalic acid EDTA
extracting solution was added, them 1 ml of Orthophosphoric
acid and then 1 ml 5% tetraoxosulphate (vi) acid
added to this mixture, 2 ml of ammonium molybdate was added and then 3ml of
water. The solution was then allowed to stand for 15 minutes after which the
absorbance at 760nm was measured with a spectrophotometer. The concentrations
of ascorbic acid in the sample were then extrapolated from a standard ascorbic.
Leaf
Extract pH- This
was done following the method adopted by Agbaire et al. [8]. Total 5g weight
of the fresh leaves was homogenized in 10ml deionized
water. This was filtered and the pH of the leaf extract determined after
calibrating pH water with buffer solution
of pH 4 and 9.
Relative
Leaf Water Content (RWC)- To calculate RWC method described by
Agbaire et al.
[8] and Singh [23] were applied to the leaf samples of
both plant species. Fresh weight was obtained by weighing the fresh leaves. The
leaves were then immersed in water overnight at 70℃ and reweighed to obtain the dry
weight.
RWC= FW-DW X 100
TW-DW
FW = Fresh weight
DW= Dry weight
TW=Turgid weight
Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI)
Determination- This was done following the method
of Singh [24]. The formula of APTI is given as:
APTI = A (T+P) + R
10
A
= Ascorbic acid content (mg/g)
T
= Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)
P
= pH of leaf extract
R = Relative water content of leaf
(%)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Changes in total chlorophyll content- The chlorophyll value was relatively low in polluted
site when compared to control. Chlorophyll content of plants signifies its
photosynthetic activity as well as the growth and development of biomass. It is
well evident that chlorophyll content of plants varies from species to species;
the age of leaf, and also with the
pollution level as well as with other biotic and abiotic
conditions [9]. Degradation of photosynthetic pigment has been
widely used as an indication of air pollution [10]. The present study revealed that chlorophyll
content in all the plants varies with the pollution status of the area i.e.
higher the pollution level in the form of vehicular exhausts lower the
chlorophyll content. It also varies with the tolerance as well as the sensitivity of the plant species i.e. higher
the sensitive nature of the plant species lower the chlorophyll content.
Studies [11-12,22-24] also suggest that
high levels of automobile pollution decrease
chlorophyll content in higher plants near roadsides. In all the plant species,
chlorophyll content was higher in monsoon season, which might be due to the
washout of dust particles from the leaf surface (which will increase
photosynthetic activity), low level of pollution and water content of soil as
suggested by Shyam et al. [13].
Table 1: Comparison of total
chlorophyll content
Plant species |
Control Site |
Polluted Site |
Caesalpinia
pulcherrima |
6.042
mg/g |
5.84
mg/g |
Catharanthus
roseus |
1.81
mg/g |
1.73
mg/g |
Changes in
ascorbic acid content- Values of ascorbic acid content were
relatively high in polluted site, when compared to control. Ascorbic acid is a very important reducing agent i.e.
ascorbic acid also plays a vital role in cell wall synthesis, defense and cell
division [14]. The present
study was showed elevation in the concentration of ascorbic acid with respect
to the control zone in all the plant species selected. Pollution load dependent
increase in the ascorbic acid content of
all the plant species may be due to the increased rate of production of
reactive oxygen species (ROS) during photo-oxidation of SO2 to SO3
where sulfites are generated from SO2 absorbed. Previous reports
suggest that higher ascorbic acid content of the plant is a sign of its
tolerance against sulphur dioxide pollution [15-16].
In the present lower ascorbic acid contents in the leaves of other plant
species studied supports the sensitive nature of these plants towards
pollutants particularly automobile exhausts. Previous study also confirmed an increase in the concentration of ascorbic acid
in the leaves of near roadsides plants due to enhanced pollution loads of
automobiles [12].
Table 2: Comparison of ascorbic acid content
Plant species |
Control Site |
Polluted Site |
Caesalpinia
pulcherrima |
8
mg/g |
9
mg/g |
Catharanthus
roseus |
6
mg/g |
7
mg/g |
Changes in
leaf extract pH- There was
a slight reduction in leaf pH among the
plant species studied with respect to the control. Previous studies
have reported that in the presence of an acidic pollutant, the leaf pH is
lowered and the decline is greater in sensitive species [17-21]. A
shift in cell sap pH towards the acid side in presence of an acidic pollutant
might decrease the efficiency of conversion of hexose
sugar to ascorbic acid. However, the reducing activity of ascorbic acid is pH
dependent being more at higher and lesser at lower pH. Hence the leaf extract pH on the higher side gives
tolerance to plants against pollution [22-25].
Table
3: Comparison of pH
Plant species |
Control Site |
Polluted Site |
Caesalpinia
pulcherrima |
5.76 |
5.81 |
Catharanthus
roseus |
6.15 |
6.2 |
Changes in
relative water content- The relative water content was high among the plant species in polluted site
when compared to control. Relative water content is associated with
protoplasmic permeability in cells causing loss of water and dissolved
nutrients, resulting in early senescence of leaves [3,18-21].
Therefore the plants with high relative water content under polluted conditions
may be tolerant to pollutants.
Table
4: Comparison of relative water content
Plant species |
Control Site |
Polluted Site |
Caesalpinia
pulcherrima |
53.84% |
63.93% |
Catharanthus
roseus |
75.43% |
85.18% |
Air Pollution
Tolerance Index- From this
study, it was found that the plant species Caesalpinia
pulcherrima had higher APTI as compared to Catharanthus
roseus, showed that Caesalpinia pulcherrima in a better condition. Nonetheless, the APTI
values of the plants at control locations showed that there was only a slight
difference in the values, indicating that they were adapting well to the environment. However, they still
fell under the sensitive group based on the APTI scale. According to the APTI
scale, any plant species with the value less than 1 is considered as very
sensitive, plant with value from 1 to 16 is considered as sensitive, plant with
value in the range of 17 to 29 is considered as intermittently tolerant and
plant with value from 30 to 100 is considered as tolerant. From the overall
results obtained, it was observed that the Catharanthus roseus was less sensitive in comparison with Caesalpinia pulcherrima. The APTI value of the Caesalpinia pulcherrima was much higher than the value of Catharanthus roseus.
Table 5: Observed value of Air Pollution
Tolerance Index (APTI)
Plant species |
Control Site |
Polluted Site |
Caesalpinia
pulcherrima |
14.82 |
16.87 |
Catharanthus
roseus |
12.27 |
14.12 |
CONCLUSIONS- In conclusion, it appears that with increase
in industrialization and urbanization, there is an increase threat of
deforestation and hence such type of APTI determinations will gain significant
importance for future planning. Firstly, this study revealed the impact of air
pollution in terms of changes took place in various biochemical parameters of
studied species. Secondly, this work threw light on the selection of air
pollution tolerant species in terms of their APTI values. The study provided
useful information for selecting tolerant species for landscaping and urban
heat island reduction. The plant species Catharanthus roseus was less sensitive in
comparison with Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Caesalpinia pulcherrima APTI
value was found to be moderately tolerant with respect to APTI classification
which could be considered for biocontrol strategy
against air pollution. Thus this study provides useful information for
selecting tolerant species for landscaping and urban heat island reduction and
for future planning. The present study recommends various tree species for
urban planting so that a wider usage of local, as well as exotic tree species,
can be explored for controlling air born pollution in urban climate.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS - The authors are highly grateful to the respective Universities and Principals
of relevant Institutions to carry out the present investigations.
REFERENCES
1.
Nagendra, SM Shiva, K. Venugopal,
and Steven L. Jones. Assessment of air quality near traffic intersections in
Bangalore city using air quality indices. Transportation Research Part D:
Transport and Environment. 2007; 167-176.
2.
Phalen, Robert F., and Robert N. Phalen.
Introduction to air pollution science. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2012.
3.
Agrawal, S. and S.L. Tiwari. Susceptibility
level of few plants on the basis of Air Pollution Tolerance Index. Indian
Forester. 1997; 123:319-322.
4. Verma P.S. and Agarwal V.K., Environmental Biology, 4th edition, Delhi, S. Chand Publications, 2002.
5. Agarwal. S.K. A new
distributional function of foliar phenol concentration in the evaluation of
plants for
their air
pollution tolerance index. Journal of
Plants. 1986; pp 29-36.
6. Abida B. and Harikrishna S. Evaluation of some tree species to absorb
air pollutants in three industrial locations of South Bengaluru
India. Journal of Chemistry, 2010; 7(S1):
S151-S156.
7. Arnon D. I. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplast Polyphenol Oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 1949; 2(1):1-15.
8. Agbaire, P.O and Esiefarinrhe, E. Air Pollution tolerance indices of some
plants around Otorogum gas plants in Delta State,
Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences, and Environmental Management. 2009;
13:11-14.
9. Katiyar, V. and P.S. Dubey: Sulphur dioxide sensitivity on two stage of leaf development in a few tropical tree species. Ind. J. Environ. Toxicol. 2001; 11:78-81.
10. Ninave, S.Y., P.R. Chaudhri,
D.G. Gajghate and J.L. Tarar.
Foliar biochemical features of plants as indicators of air pollution. Bull.
Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
2001; 67: 133-140.
11. Mir, Q.A., T. Yazdani, A.
Kumar, K. Narain and M. Yunus.
Vehicular population and pigment content of certain avenue trees. Poll. Res.,
2008; 27:59-63.
12. Tripathi, A.K. and M. Gautam.
Biochemical parameters of plants as indicators of air pollution. J. Environ.
Biol., 2007; 28:127-132.
13. Shyam, S., H.N. Verma and S.K. Bhargava. Air pollution and its impact on plant growth. New
India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, 2006.
14. Conklin, P.L.: Recent advances in the role and
biosynthesis of ascorbic acid in plants. Plant Cell Environ, 2001; 24:383-394.
15. Chaudhary, C.S. and D.N. Rao. Study
of some factors in plants controlling their susceptibility to sulphur dioxide pollution. Proc. Ind. Natl. Sci. Acad. Part
B., 1977; 46: 236-241.
16. Varshney, S.R.K. and C.K. Varshney.
Effects of sulphur dioxide on ascorbic acid in crop
plants. Environ. Pollut., 1984; 35: 285-291.
17. Scholz, F. and S. Reck. Effects
of acids on forest trees as measured by titration invitro
inheritance of buffering capacity in Picea-Abies.
Water, Air Soil Pollut., 1977; 8:41-45.
18. Agrawal, A.L. Air pollution control studies and impact
assessment of stack and fugitive emissions from CCI Akaltara
Cement Factory. Project Report, Project sponsored by M/s. CCI Akaltara Cement Factory. NEERI, Nagpur, 1988.
19.
Bajaj, K. L and Kaur,
G. Spectrophotometric Determination of ascorbic acid
in vegetables and fruits. Analyst. 1981; 106:117-120.
20. Dwivedi, A.K. and B.D. Tripathi. Pollution tolerance and distribution pattern of plants in surrounding area of coal-fired industries. J. Environ. Biol., 2007; 28:257-263.
21. Krishnaveni, M. Air pollution tolerance index and antioxidant
activity of Parthenium hysterophorus.
Journal of Pharmacy Research, 2013; 7(4):296-298.
22. Ayres, Robert U., and Joerg
Walter. The greenhouse effect: damages, costs and abatement. Environmental and
Resource Economics. 1991; 1:3:237-270.
23.
Singh, A. Practical Plant physiology. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi, 1977.
24. Singh, S.K and Rao, D.N. Evaluation of plants for their tolerance to air pollution, proceedings of the symposium on air pollution control, 1983; 218-224.
25. Vailshery, Lionel Sujay, Madhumitha Jaganmohan, and Harini Nagendra. Effect of street
trees on microclimate and air pollution in a tropical city. Urban forestry
& urban greening. 2013; 408-415.